<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AI Archives - ClickedyClick</title>
	<atom:link href="https://gergely.imreh.net/blog/tag/ai/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://gergely.imreh.net/blog/tag/ai/</link>
	<description>Life in real, complex and digital.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Internet hates programming</title>
		<link>https://gergely.imreh.net/blog/2012/11/the-internet-hates-programming/</link>
					<comments>https://gergely.imreh.net/blog/2012/11/the-internet-hates-programming/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gergely Imreh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gergely.imreh.net/blog/?p=1194</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Used Google's spelling suggestions to see what the Internet thinks about various programming languages.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gergely.imreh.net/blog/2012/11/the-internet-hates-programming/">The Internet hates programming</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gergely.imreh.net/blog">ClickedyClick</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was annoyed the other day by something the other day (well, by meetings in general), and wanted to check if other people are just as annoyed by it than I am. So I went to Google, started to enter <em>&#8220;meetings are&#8230;&#8221;</em> and since <a title="Where do search corrections come from?" href="http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/526503.html" target="_blank">search is correcting what I type according to what people look for and type around the Internet</a>, I got this:</p>
<figure id="attachment_1199" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1199" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://gergely.imreh.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/google_meetings_are.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-1199 " title="Google's suggestions for what meetings are" src="http://gergely.imreh.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/google_meetings_are.jpg" alt="Google's suggestions for what meetings are" width="500" height="277" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1199" class="wp-caption-text">Google&#8217;s suggestions for what meetings are according to the Internet</figcaption></figure>
<p>The results were really for my liking, and I was thinking whether I can use this to get some insights into fields of knowledge, for example what does the Internet think about different programming languages?</p>
<p>Started with LabView, since that&#8217;s the one I&#8217;m struggling at work at the moment (that&#8217;s for some other stories). I don&#8221;t want to overly generalize, and I have a lot to learn about it, but still, I am not <em>that</em> surprised by the Number 1 spell correction:</p>
<figure id="attachment_1200" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1200" style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://gergely.imreh.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/google_labview.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-1200" title="Labview is crap" src="http://gergely.imreh.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/google_labview.jpg" alt="Labview is crap" width="500" height="274" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1200" class="wp-caption-text">Labview is&#8230;.. crap, according to the Internet</figcaption></figure>
<p>So let&#8217;s see how the other languages and software engineering keywords come are treated?</p>
<h2>Positive sentiments</h2>
<p>There were some keywords with positive sentiments, never really among the top suggestions and never too many but there were</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Haskell homepage" href="http://www.haskell.org/" target="_blank">Haskell</a> is the future</li>
<li><a title="Ruby on Rails home" href="http://rubyonrails.org/" target="_blank">Ruby on Rails</a> is hot</li>
<li><a title="Functional programming on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming" target="_blank">Functional programming</a> is the future</li>
<li><a title="Pascal central" href="http://pascal-central.com/ppl/index.html" target="_blank">Pascal</a> is still used</li>
<li><a title="GNU Smalltalk home" href="http://smalltalk.gnu.org/" target="_blank">Smalltalk</a> is worth learning</li>
<li><a title="Lisp on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_(programming_language)" target="_blank">Lisp</a> is the red pill</li>
<li><a title="Forth interest group" href="http://www.forth.org/" target="_blank">Forth</a> is king</li>
</ul>
<h2>Neutral sentiments</h2>
<p>There are some languages, that come up only with language related corrections, I guess that&#8217;s mostly because people don&#8217;t have strong negative or positive feelings, or maybe it&#8217;s more confusing then infuriating? Or people just don&#8217;t know much about some of these?</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Python homepage" href="http://www.python.org/" target="_blank">Python</a></li>
<li><a title="Visual Basic on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_Basic" target="_blank">Visual Basic</a></li>
<li><a title="PHP homepage" href="http://php.net/" target="_blank">PHP</a></li>
<li><a title="Javascript on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript" target="_blank">Javascript</a></li>
<li><a title="Prolog on Wikipedia" href="http://www.lua.org/" target="_blank">Prolog</a></li>
<li><a title="Lua homepage" href="http://www.lua.org/" target="_blank">Lua</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Mostly negative sentiments</h2>
<p>Now onto the good parts&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="LabView homepage" href="http://www.ni.com/labview" target="_blank">Labview</a> is crap</li>
<li><a title="Ruby on Rails homepage" href="http://rubyonrails.org/" target="_blank">Ruby on Rails</a> is dead, dying, stupid</li>
<li><a title="Haskell homepage" href="http://www.haskell.org/" target="_blank">Haskell</a> is useless, exceptionally unsafe, hard</li>
<li><a title="Erlang homepage" href="http://www.erlang.org/" target="_blank">Erlang</a> is a ghetto</li>
<li><a title="NodeJS homepage" href="http://nodejs.org/" target="_blank">NodeJS</a> is cancer, stupid, what is it good for</li>
<li><a title="C++ on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B" target="_blank">C++</a> is hard</li>
<li><a title="Functional programming on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_programming" target="_blank">Functional programming</a> is a ghetto, hard, worse than crap, overrated, bad</li>
<li><a title="Object oriented programming on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming" target="_blank">Object oriented programming</a> is bad, dead, hard, an exceptionally bad idea, bullshit, overrated</li>
<li><a title="Pascal central" href="http://pascal-central.com/ppl/index.html" target="_blank">Pascal</a> is dead</li>
<li><a title="GNU Smalltalk home" href="http://smalltalk.gnu.org/" target="_blank">Smalltalk</a> is dead</li>
<li><a title="Lisp on wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_(programming_language)" target="_blank">Lisp</a> is not an acceptable lisp, a sin, dead, slow</li>
<li><a title="Forth interest group" href="http://www.forth.org/" target="_blank">Forth</a> is dead</li>
<li><a title="Java homepage" href="http://www.java.com/" target="_blank">Java</a> is corrupt, not working, out of date, dead</li>
<li><a title="OCaml homepage" href="http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/" target="_blank">OCaml</a> is dead</li>
</ul>
<p>I think my favorites are &#8220;worse than crap&#8221; and &#8220;an exceptionally bad idea&#8221;, with so explicit phrases, people must feel very strongly about it. Also, I&#8217;m surprised that with this many &#8220;dead&#8221; languages there&#8217;s still any programming going on! Of course, this is not an exhaustive list, would love to see more examples, and add to the list</p>
<p>Anyways, let&#8217;s head back to coding now that I have cheered myself up. Programming is hard, and the Internet knows that too.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gergely.imreh.net/blog/2012/11/the-internet-hates-programming/">The Internet hates programming</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gergely.imreh.net/blog">ClickedyClick</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://gergely.imreh.net/blog/2012/11/the-internet-hates-programming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 18/21 objects using APC
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)

Served from: gergely.imreh.net @ 2026-10-25 21:59:32 by W3 Total Cache
-->